Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Ara ararauna Luc Viatour.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Image:Ara ararauna Luc Viatour.jpg, featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 May 2012 at 05:45:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Info created and uploaded by Luc Viatour - nominated by Solar Police -- Solar Police↑↑Speak 05:45, 11 May 2012 (UTC)
- Support--Earth'sbuddy
- Support -- Solar Police↑↑Speak 05:45, 11 May 2012 (UTC)
- Support —Bruce1eetalk 06:34, 11 May 2012 (UTC)
- Support Žiga (talk) 07:15, 11 May 2012 (UTC)
- Support Tomer T (talk) 08:43, 11 May 2012 (UTC)
- Support -- -donald- (talk) 09:45, 11 May 2012 (UTC)
- Support Albertus teolog (talk) 12:00, 11 May 2012 (UTC)
- Support Great picture--David საქართველო 12:04, 11 May 2012 (UTC)
- Support --Cephas (talk) 13:21, 11 May 2012 (UTC)
- Support -- Some noise, though. --Telemaque MySon (talk) 15:19, 11 May 2012 (UTC)
- (weak) Oppose Great shot, esp. the background is well-chosen. But the parrot looks/is plucked and there are several quality issues (head out of focus, (colour) noise, IMHO some (motion) blur). Difficult to take, however the result is not good enough to be featured. --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 15:45, 11 May 2012 (UTC)
- (weak) Oppose As Carschten. The eye has motion blur. The wings are worse. I think t=1/640 is not fast enough for birds in flight (doesn't matter if the lens has OS). Awesome image of course, excellent composition and background, nice colors and wow factor, but not featured picture imo, due to the many technical issues. --Paolo Costa (talk) 16:53, 11 May 2012 (UTC)
- Comment Com'on guys, this is an excellent picture under outdoor conditions. If the Ara's wingtips were slow enougth for an perfectly sharp exposure it might porpably just have dropped like a stone. You can't compare this to studio condition! For me the slight motion blur even supports the image's effect. --Martin Kraft (talk) 18:05, 11 May 2012 (UTC)
- I know, but keep in mind there're dozens of FPs of birds to compare with: we are not comparing to studio shots but to already featured pictures of birds on Commons, check the gallery out and you'll see the bar is quite high. --Paolo Costa (talk) 18:24, 11 May 2012 (UTC)
- There are only three of this particular bird and they are all head shots. --Solar Police↑↑Speak 19:32, 11 May 2012 (UTC)
- I know, but keep in mind there're dozens of FPs of birds to compare with: we are not comparing to studio shots but to already featured pictures of birds on Commons, check the gallery out and you'll see the bar is quite high. --Paolo Costa (talk) 18:24, 11 May 2012 (UTC)
- Comment Com'on guys, this is an excellent picture under outdoor conditions. If the Ara's wingtips were slow enougth for an perfectly sharp exposure it might porpably just have dropped like a stone. You can't compare this to studio condition! For me the slight motion blur even supports the image's effect. --Martin Kraft (talk) 18:05, 11 May 2012 (UTC)
- Support Yann (talk) 17:50, 11 May 2012 (UTC)
- Support --Martin Kraft (talk) 18:05, 11 May 2012 (UTC)
- Oppose too noisy, to unsharp. The same image was nominated in the past too. It wasn't FP. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 20:48, 11 May 2012 (UTC)
SupportYes, but the standards were much higher then! พ.s. 00:02, 12 May 2012 (UTC)- Comment Interesting trend, IMO the bar should be the same for all images. But I guess that's just utopia. —kallerna™ 09:39, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
- Oppose Of course you are correct, I was just noticing a recent trend. FP is not what it used to be, sadly... พ.s. 12:10, 19 May 2012 (UTC)
- Again ? Unfortunately, some comments and votes continue to be what they used to be, sadly...--Jebulon (talk) 14:48, 19 May 2012 (UTC)
- Last time it almost made it to FP. Don't forget that this image almost didn't make it to FP. Tomer T (talk) 13:08, 20 May 2012 (UTC)
- Again ? Unfortunately, some comments and votes continue to be what they used to be, sadly...--Jebulon (talk) 14:48, 19 May 2012 (UTC)
- Oppose Of course you are correct, I was just noticing a recent trend. FP is not what it used to be, sadly... พ.s. 12:10, 19 May 2012 (UTC)
- Comment Interesting trend, IMO the bar should be the same for all images. But I guess that's just utopia. —kallerna™ 09:39, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
- Support Support. -- Raghith 06:17, 12 May 2012 (UTC)
- Support Xyxyx (talk) 12:49, 12 May 2012 (UTC)
- Support--H. Krisp (talk) 17:45, 12 May 2012 (UTC)
- Support --Tamba52 (talk) 05:41, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
- Oppose Nothing has changed. —kallerna™ 09:40, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
- Support -- Crisco 1492 (talk) 04:25, 17 May 2012 (UTC)
- Support Σ (talk) 05:57, 18 May 2012 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Kallerna --Jebulon (talk) 15:11, 19 May 2012 (UTC)
Alt
[edit]Confirmed results:
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds
The chosen alternative is: File:Ara ararauna Luc Viatour.jpg