Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Liège-Guillemins train station

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Liège-Guillemins_train_station

[edit]

No FOP in Belgium: architect is still alive. Not in public domain before at least 2083 (if architect dies this year).

Content under copyrighted (thus to delete)

[edit]
no deletion: Main subject is the model showing an idea of the future area rather than the actual one, the architecture is hardly recognisable.
The model itself is copyrightable.PierreSelim (talk) 08:17, 17 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
No deletion: Subject are the workers. Is a bordercase.
no deletion: Main subject is the model showing an idea of the future area rather than the actual one, the architecture is hardly recognisable.

border line cases

[edit]
No deletion: The main subject is the orchestra and the city background. The architecture element is only partial. Smiley.toerist (talk) 17:44, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
To me crop, focal length, distance to the subject were chosen in order to show the architecture behind. For this reason I believe COM:DM doesn't apply. PierreSelim (talk) 11:12, 17 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
No deletion: Main subject is the locomotieve and not the architecture. The architecture is only marginaly and incomplete in the picture.Smiley.toerist (talk) 17:17, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
To me crop, focal length, distance to the subject were chosen in order to show the architecture behind. For this reason I believe COM:DM doesn't apply. PierreSelim (talk) 11:12, 17 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Cropped like this? File:Liege type 15.cropped.JPGSmiley.toerist (talk) 10:48, 26 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
No deletion: Main subject is the multiply unit and not the architecture.Smiley.toerist (talk) 17:45, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
To me crop, focal length, distance to the subject were chosen in order to show the architecture behind. For this reason I believe COM:DM doesn't apply. PierreSelim (talk) 11:12, 17 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Content that should be kept (either COM:DM or nothing copyrighted)

[edit]
Chaotic picture: Architecture content is minimal. I would say keep, but is of low-value
No delete: No architect elements visible.
No deletion: no significant station architecture is visible. Smiley.toerist (talk) 16:53, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]


PierreSelim (talk) 16:18, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

From the fact that this nomination contains multiple obvious free images like File:Liege Loc 201010.jpg I conclude that this nomination is rather sloppy. I hate sloppy nominations because those might get free images deleted. Please clean up the list so that it only contains clear FOP violations. You might want to (re-)read Commons:De minimis too. Multichill (talk) 21:03, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
re-read the file list: please accept my appologies. To understand how I sorted the files I have used a temporary gallery on my user page + models are copyrighted, and borderline cases can be COM:DM but it seems the author intentionally chose to have the building in the crop. PierreSelim (talk) 22:18, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Les lois sont là, d'accord, mais il y a quand même des limites à la déraison : si M. Calatrava ne voulait pas que l'on montre ou voit sa gare, qui est en l'un des lieux les plus fréquentés de la ville de Liège, il ne fallait pas la construire, ou alors qu'on l'emballe, et si on demande cela à Christo, c'est lui qui touchera les droits ? Immensément stupide et hypocrite ce débat, auquel je ne participerai pas au-delà de cette remarque. --Jean Housen 19:13, 18 January 2012 (UTC)


I deleted the clear cases (and the workers were one, a photo about them would have zoomed more), the aerial view and the maquettes version. File:Liege Loc 201010.jpg is kept.

For the extra ones, I would delete File:Guillemins13.JPG as it shows the bridge, and keep File:Guillemins19.JPG and File:Liege Philarmonic Orchestra at Liege-Guillemins Railway Station03.jpg, per de minimis. I strongly insist File:MS62 262 Liege.jpg is de minimis: the main subject is really the train, prominent and in foreground. --Dereckson (talk) 22:40, 24 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: by Dereckson Morning Sunshine (talk) 10:48, 18 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Liège-Guillemins train station

There is no COM:FOP in Belgium, and the architect is still alive.

russavia (talk) 13:51, 6 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry (talk) 01:08, 13 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Liège-Guillemins train station

Train station under copyright : build by the contemporary Architect Calatrava, No-FOP on Belgium.

M0tty (talk) 14:47, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ich habe eine Genehmigung von Santiago persönlich. Aber immer löscht... Das macht langsam keinen Spaß mehr. --Ralf Roleček 14:55, 8 October 2014 (UTC) Außerdem ist die Architektue bei keinem der Bilder Hauptobjekt, die Bilder vom Bahnhof selbst habe ich erst gar nicht hochgeladen, die sind auf meiner Homepage.[reply]

Some kep, some deleted, as per Jeriby. Yann (talk) 11:52, 16 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Deletion_requests/Files_in_Category:Liège-Guillemins_train_station&oldid=325889567"